Welcome to SomaliNet Forums, a friendly and gigantic Somali centric active community. Login to hide this block

You are currently viewing this page as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, ask questions, educate others, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many, many other features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join SomaliNet forums today! Please note that registered members with over 50 posts see no ads whatsoever! Are you new to SomaliNet? These forums with millions of posts are just one section of a much larger site. Just visit the front page and use the top links to explore deep into SomaliNet oasis, Somali singles, Somali business directory, Somali job bank and much more. Click here to login. If you need to reset your password, click here. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Xamar shouldn't have been the capital...

Daily chitchat on Somali politics.

Moderator: Moderators

OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE
User avatar
Warabaha
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1724
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:41 pm

Re: Xamar shouldn't have been the capital...

Postby Warabaha » Fri May 23, 2014 12:51 pm

Liquid you are more confused then Joseph fritzel's grandchildren. Somaliland should never joined somalia in the first place.

Xildiiid
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 7200
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 4:45 pm
Location: Since light travels faster than sound, people appear bright until you hear them speak

Re: Xamar shouldn't have been the capital...

Postby Xildiiid » Fri May 23, 2014 3:44 pm

Meth, that arguement is null and void considering the state framework was democracy. Egal made an opposition party and eventually became PM. The problem is, (this may be considered controversial) North-South divide is something only you deem acceptable. Northern Somalia was only 2 regions whereas Southern Somalia was 6. The North was simply a territory of Somalis carved up, just like Galbeed and NFD. If Galbeed became independent, does that mean power should be shared 3-way?

There was no state to begin with since the binding documents were not signed by Somalia, in other words there was no union, so your argument is null and void.

However


Meth might be a confused dude but what he's talking about is that there was no equal power sharing at the time of the illegal unification. There had been no elections yet during the one year interim government Somalia got the President, Prime minister, speaker and all the important government positions not to mention 133 MP's were from Somalia while 23 MP's were from Somaliland. Two of the government positions were given to Somaliland politicians.


The intentions of Somalia was clear. Just to correct you, Somaliland was never part of Somalia and never will, it's not northern Somalia but northern parts of the Somali Republic.


OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE

Hello, Has your question been answered on this page? We hope yes. If not, you can start a new thread and post your question(s). It is free to join. You can also search our over a million pages (just scroll up and use our site-wide search box) or browse the forums.

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Politics - General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Garadkin and 30 guests