all these so called inspirational leaders are coons

waraabe251 · Postby **waraabe251** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 3:39 pm

People like MLK, GANDHI and Nelson Mandela are a bunch of puppets who filled their people with useless and dangerous ideology.

MLK was by far the worst one. There is a reason why great men like Malcom x are not promoted nor remembered, dream is what sleeping people do, what awake people is demand and fight for their rights. As Malcom x said, you shouldn't be for your basic rights but take them. MLK was a begging and advocating for blacks to be gentle to their tormentors.
Gandhi was crying ppeac at a time when his people were all slaves but in name

Mandela was advocating for non violence when his people where experiencing the worst violence, school children were being shot.

There is a reason why these sites called leaders are promoted which is that it ensures that Europeans are same while they continue to carry on.

theyuusuf143 · Postby **theyuusuf143** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:31 pm

Usually weak ass freedom activities like mandela and gandi are promoted by the whites as heroes. colonial goverments hate Voilent freedom fighters like sayid mohamed, omar mokhtar and the algerians. After the dervish movement we had sheikh bashir who was as voilent as the sayid. he was killed withing few years ! , While Farah omar who was gandi inspired unarmed activist were jailed and released several times . Warriors dont live longer.

LobsterUnit · Postby **LobsterUnit** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:42 pm

#.mandela abandoned non violence for military action after the police massacre, started to launch attacks and then he spent 27 years in prison.after his release from prison ,he had little choice to accodomate the cadaans due to pressure from the West. His failure wad one of politics and economics-not ideology.this nostalgic romanticism of african millitancy has to stop.many african revolutionary heroes and independence fighters became despots.

waraabe251 · Postby **waraabe251** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:49 pm

Usually weak ass freedom activities like mandela and gandi are promoted by the whites as heroes. colonial goverments hate Voilent freedom fighters like sayid mohamed, omar mokhtar and the algerians. After the dervish movement we had sheikh bashir who was as voilent as the sayid. he was killed withing few years ! , While Farah omar who was gandi inspired unarmed activist were jailed and released several times . Warriors dont live longer.

Remember tho, the mad mullah killed more somalis parparticularly harti and so on then the so called british. That is why warsangeli sultaan joined the british

TheMailMan · Postby **TheMailMan** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:53 pm

I agree with this 100%

Martin Luther King was a flower. Instead of empowering Blacks to create their own institutions and systems, he wanted to integrate his people with Whites. If he had any real pride in his people he would NEVER advocate such a thing. Why would you wanna beg White people so you can sit and eat in the same restaurants as them, when they don't even want to be around you? Why do you wanna beg people to live and eat amongst them? Martin Luther King was a miskeen, he had no balls

Malcolm X however was a real man worthy of respect.

Machiavelli2 · Postby **Machiavelli2** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:54 pm

Theyusuf

Old warriors still exist and once they come to power, they think it is their God given right to rule their country till their last breadth. If they are any better, why would Somali asylum seekers prefer to settle in violent South African townships and not settle in Zimbabwe? After all Zimbabwe is led by one of the last freedom fighters. No sane person would live there but will cross over to South Africa, why? Give me Ghandi, MLK Mandela any day than Mugabe and fellow dictators who think the State is synonymous with their personalities. What has Malcolm X achieved for the blacks in America in comparison to MLK? Nothing. He was guided by his hatred towards the white man because of how badly he was treated in their jails as a criminal. He was happy to be received in the Gulf Arab Countries and served by their black African slaves in the early Sixties. He wasn't fighting for black people's freedom.

Togdeer · Postby **Togdeer** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:58 pm

But Violance just creates more Violance.
Look at Libya, Egypt, Iraq...
Are they not worse off now they got rid of their old leaders.
Politics is the only way to get things in the 21st century.

LobsterUnit · Postby **LobsterUnit** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:03 pm

Theyusuf

Old warriors still exist and once they come to power, they think it is their God given right to rule their country till their last breadth. If they are any better, why would Somali asylum seekers prefer to settle in violent South African townships and not settle in Zimbabwe? After all Zimbabwe is led by one of the last freedom fighters. No sane person would live there but will cross over to South Africa, why? Give me Ghandi, MLK Mandela any day than Mugabe and fellow dictators who think the State is synonymous with their personalities. What has Malcolm X achieved for the blacks in America in comparison to MLK? Nothing. He was guided by his hatred towards the white man because of how badly he was treated in their jails as a criminal. He was happy to be received in the Gulf Arab Countries and served by their black African slaves in the early Sixties. He wasn't fighting for black people's freedom.

You were doing well until the great elephant of a gaf against that giant of a man:ashaheed malik ibn shabaz bin xa. Shame on you.

LightAtNight · Postby **LightAtNight** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:07 pm

Usually weak ass freedom activities like mandela and gandi are promoted by the whites as heroes. colonial goverments hate Voilent freedom fighters like sayid mohamed, omar mokhtar and the algerians. After the dervish movement we had sheikh bashir who was as voilent as the sayid. he was killed withing few years ! , While Farah omar who was gandi inspired unarmed activist were jailed and released several times . Warriors dont live longer.
Remember tho, the mad mullah killed more somalis parparticularly harti and so on then the so called british. That is why warsangeli sultaan joined the british

He had to eliminate the munafiqs

Lancer · Postby **Lancer** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:11 pm

Usually weak ass freedom activities like mandela and gandi are promoted by the whites as heroes. colonial goverments hate Voilent freedom fighters like sayid mohamed, omar mokhtar and the algerians. After the dervish movement we had sheikh bashir who was as voilent as the sayid. he was killed withing few years ! , While Farah omar who was gandi inspired unarmed activist were jailed and released several times . Warriors dont live longer.
Remember tho, the mad mullah killed more somalis parparticularly harti and so on then the so called british. That is why warsangeli sultaan joined the british
He had to eliminate the munafiqs

just like alshabab is doing now

Hyperactive · Postby **Hyperactive** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:18 pm

they did what they had to do, we may disagree now but you never know reality of their action until you walk on their shoes.

they made their remarks in this world and now God knows their situation. I would love God to forgive me and mercy on my poor soul if i was in their place today!.

LightAtNight · Postby **LightAtNight** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:19 pm

If he was alive now he'd probably be a member

Lancer · Postby **Lancer** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:25 pm

If he was alive now he'd probably be a member

That is why I find it ironic how somalis praise one and condemn the other.

Machiavelli2 · Postby **Machiavelli2** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:54 pm

Baasto

Let us agree to disagree. MLK politics produced Obama, Eric Holder and many other black leaders. He was the reason why the KKK is now a fringe hated group by most Americans. While the politics of Malcolm X produced defeatism based on victimisation and gangsta rap artist. The world needs people like MLK. Have you ever asked why Israel considers Barghouti as the most dangerous Palestinian and not Hamas?

theyuusuf143 · Postby **theyuusuf143** » Sun Jan 25, 2015 6:27 pm

Usually weak ass freedom activities like mandela and gandi are promoted by the whites as heroes. colonial goverments hate Voilent freedom fighters like sayid mohamed, omar mokhtar and the algerians. After the dervish movement we had sheikh bashir who was as voilent as the sayid. he was killed withing few years ! , While Farah omar who was gandi inspired unarmed activist were jailed and released several times . Warriors dont live longer.
Remember tho, the mad mullah killed more somalis parparticularly harti and so on then the so called british. That is why warsangeli sultaan joined the british

His followers were killed too by the british Somali levies ! One thing is for Sure Sayid mohamed was fighting for anti colonial idiology, he did his best to fight until he died. His legacy have both positive and negative moments. today alshabaab are terroristies but remember in 2009 they were the heroes who forced ethiopia to pull out somalia. I realised that all Somali revolutions were always positive in the beggining but we then turned each an other because of external powers. All Somali civil wars are direct result of foreign intervention.

SomaliNet Forums

Welcome to SomaliNet Forums, a friendly and gigantic Somali centric active community. Login to hide this block