
[African economies, GDP per capita by PPP as of March.]
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
I agree with you to some extent, average intelligence of a population is predictive of economic development.Jugjugwacwac wrote:The most important factor in the wealth of nations is human capital, more so than natural resources, geographic location, climate, arable land, livestock, fresh water etc. And the most important factor in the development of human capital is the average intelligence of the population in a given country. Case in point, Singapore - a model country (has nothing except human capital largely due to high IQ of Singaporeans) vs Nigeria - majority of population living in poverty (has everything except human capital due to low IQ of the natives, except the Igbo).
I agree with u saaxiib. Illaahay caqli wuu ina siiyay, diidnay se inaynu isticmaalno.thegoodshepherd wrote:I agree with you to some extent, average intelligence of a population is predictive of economic development.Jugjugwacwac wrote:The most important factor in the wealth of nations is human capital, more so than natural resources, geographic location, climate, arable land, livestock, fresh water etc. And the most important factor in the development of human capital is the average intelligence of the population in a given country. Case in point, Singapore - a model country (has nothing except human capital largely due to high IQ of Singaporeans) vs Nigeria - majority of population living in poverty (has everything except human capital due to low IQ of the natives, except the Igbo).
But Somalis probably have an IQ that is somewhat higher than the African average. The average sub-saharan GDP per capita is close to $1,700, which is also what the average Djiboutian makes in a year. Djibouti, which is more arid than even Bari, is able to have an average per capita GDP higher than Kenya, a country richer than Djibouti in every resource.
What I am trying to say is that Somalis have sufficient IQ to reach middle income status of GDP per capita around $3,000-$4,000.
We are not even close to reaching the point where our average IQ is hindering development.
Ignorant somalinimocentric chest-thumping. Using GDP to compare a country of 42 million people with Djibouti's population of 800,000 is dumb. Kenya's middle-class is so much bigger than most African countries and the state of infrastructure is quite developed. And for your information, 70% of Kenya is very arid.thegoodshepherd wrote:
I agree with you to some extent, average intelligence of a population is predictive of economic development.
But Somalis probably have an IQ that is somewhat higher than the African average. The average sub-saharan GDP per capita is close to $1,700, which is also what the average Djiboutian makes in a year. Djibouti, which is more arid than even Bari, is able to have an average per capita GDP higher than Kenya, a country richer than Djibouti in every resource.
What I am trying to say is that Somalis have sufficient IQ to reach middle income status of GDP per capita around $3,000-$4,000.
We are not even close to reaching the point where our average IQ is hindering development.
I Just used it to show that Somalis are perfectly capable of reaching lower-middle income status. Kenya is a poor country by African standards, and having a few thousand out of 50 million be millionaires does not change this fact. The only region within Kenya that is remotely developed is Central province, which has sucked dry the rest of the country for its own development.Damat wrote: Ignorant somalinimocentric chest-thumping. Using GDP to compare a country of 42 million people with Djibouti's population of 800,000 is dumb. Kenya's middle-class is so much bigger than most African countries and the state of infrastructure is quite developed. And for your information, 70% of Kenya is very arid.
PrinceDaadi wrote:I highly doubt it has something to do with IQ, most of world's population have got more or less same IQ provided that you exposed them same environment.
In the 90s and early 2000s Zimbabwe was a rich country but due to Zimbabwe's attempt to distribute land, western sanction and poor leadership has brought down Zimbabwe's economy.
Kenya has got everything to be a rich country:- a growing middle class, a strong private sector and energetic skilled man power, it has got everything to be a successful country except a leadership with vision.
If you want to know how to lift a country out of poverty you can study Singapore, South Korea, Malaysia and Irland. Each of these country has taken different path but they shared one thing a vision a place where they r going and they built institution to serve that vision.
Those of you who r interested more of this can read this book, a lot has changed since it was written but the basic concept is still same.
Sucked what from the rest of the country? Do you have a comprehension problem? 70% of Kenya is semi-desert, Kenya's economy is built on agriculture (horticulture & Tea/Coffee sold to Arab countries & Europe) specifically grown in Central Kenya & some parts of Rift Valley. Kenya's foreign earnings are generated in Central Kenya dummy.thegoodshepherd wrote:I Just used it to show that Somalis are perfectly capable of reaching lower-middle income status. Kenya is a poor country by African standards, and having a few thousand out of 50 million be millionaires does not change this fact. The only region within Kenya that is remotely developed is Central province, which has sucked dry the rest of the country for its own development.Damat wrote: Ignorant somalinimocentric chest-thumping. Using GDP to compare a country of 42 million people with Djibouti's population of 800,000 is dumb. Kenya's middle-class is so much bigger than most African countries and the state of infrastructure is quite developed. And for your information, 70% of Kenya is very arid.
I don't really care too much about 'richness', I just don't want to see Africans get left behind in development and standard of life. We can't rely on our natural resources forever.AgentOfChaos wrote:The fucked up present day distorted standards of "richness" is set up the already rich and powerful countries centuries ago. This superficial characterization of countries is nothing more than a tool for the f-king "elite" countries to make themselves feel good at the expense of others.