@agnostic,
qoute,
"Agnosticism is the healthier and moderate postion to theism or atheism which are both at the extreme ends of the debate concerning the orgin of the universe. And it's not only concerned with theology. One can be agnostic about any given matter for which one believes that there isn't sufficient emprical proof to believe either way."
-------------------------------
Actually my free bird, forget theoretical or theological, let's talk some therapy dear. Provided your depiction above suffices an agnostics’ outlook on life, the supposed position of an agnostic is not the healthy, moderately mid of two extreme ends kinda position you are attempting to sell to others (and possibly to self in a clandestine inadvertent sorta way), but is a rather an extreme position in its own rite of infinite doubt that is mentally famishing.
I mean agnostics at best operate haphazardly without ever unlocking the logic chamber of their brain, this could very well be due to the constant whispers of doubt central to their thinking process.
Don’t’ get me wrong, it is quite healthy for a mind to explore and employ doubt in search of the truth, but when the findings of that search and the truth for that matter is besieged yet again by the endless cycle of doubt, what good is ever reaped from such endeavour? It’s pointless and fruitless. Yikes talk about an unfulfilling life. Sorry dear but that is no healthy position to be at, marka let me cure u huuno. I am very good with this psychology stuff dee, just ask my professors in that field, one of them to be particular, a loose existentialist who if I may add, fell victim to my argumentative nature on one occasion during a class debate on these trivial matters and the pointless puzzle agnostics are pitifully engaged in its unravel.
